Self-Questioning and Experimentation: An Index Vocabulary of Situated Interaction
نویسندگان
چکیده
Various cognitive and computational models have addressed the use of previous experience to understand a new domain. In particular, research in case-based reasoning has explored the ideas of retrieving and adapting previous experience in the form of cases. If the cases take the form of plans, the process is referred to as case-based planning. We have developed a computational model of Exploratory Discovery which integrates case-based reasoning and case-based planning. Motivated by results from cognitive science, we incorporated in this model the features of exploration and self-questioning to improve the case-based learning process. This paper will focus on the index vocabulary needed to accomplish the interaction between the case-based generation of self-questions and the case-based experimentation process. The interaction depends on questions asked, answers given, and previously performed experiments. Interaction is therefore situated. 1. Continuous Case-Based Reasoning When people are exposed to an unfamiliar task such as understanding a new device, they are sometimes reminded of previous experience in other domains. Cognitive models of reminding have evolved in an attempt to explain this phenomenon (e.g., Ross 1989). The concept of re-use of previous experience has been exploited in the paradigm of case-based reasoning where previous experience is usually represented as cases (see Kolodner 1993 for an overview). There is a strong mutual relationship between cognitive models of reminding and case-based reasoning. Perhaps the most crucial issues in case-based reasoning are the retrieval and modification of previous 1st UK Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, 1995
منابع مشابه
Contribution of Academic Vocabulary and Academic Self-Concept to Academic Listening Comprehension of Undergraduate Students of Engineering
The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of academic vocabulary knowledge and academic listening self-concept to the academic listening comprehension of Iranian Engineering students. The participants of this study were 147 undergraduate students at the Iran University of Science and Technology. A revised version of the academic self-concept questionnaire developed by Liu and ...
متن کاملThe Interaction between Involvement Load Hypothesis Evaluation Criterion and Language Proficiency: A Case in Vocabulary Retention
A long-standing debate among the vocabulary researchers is the depth of processing to learn vocabulary. This paper is a quantitative research which considers a revision in the “involvement load hypothesis” proposed by Laufer and Hulstijn in 2001. It investigates the role of proficiency and evaluation in this hypothesis in order to better reveal its potential contribution to vocabulary learning....
متن کاملL2 Vocabulary Learning and the Use of Reading Tasks: Manipulating the Involvement Load Index
As Schmidt (2008) states, deeper engagement with new vocabulary as induced by tasks clearly increases the chances of learning those words. This engagement is theoretically clarified by the involvement load hypothesis (ILH, Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001), based on which the involvement index of each task can be measured. The present study was designed to test ILH by evaluating the impact of 4 differ...
متن کاملThe Involvement Load Hypothesis and Vocabulary Learning: The Effect of Task Types and Involvement Index on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition
This study builds on Laufer and Hulstijn’s (2001) motivational-cognitive construct of task-induced involvement in learning vocabulary and addresses itself to its strong claim that the depth of processing is the overriding factor in learning words. The paper first re-examines the effect of processing load and then of task type on the initial learning and retention of words. To do so, 60 EFL lear...
متن کاملImpact of Interaction and Output Modality on the Vocabulary Learning and Retention of Iranian EFL Learners
This study investigated the impact of interaction and output modality on vocabulary learning and retention of EFL learners. To investigate the impact of Interaction, solitary (n =69) and collaborative (n =62) groups served as experimental and No Interaction No Output (n =26) as control group. To address the effect of modality, spoken (n =39) and written (n =31) modalities served as experimental...
متن کامل